Credit Repair and Loan Modification – Good or Bad For Net Branch?

Credit Repair and Loan Modification – Good or Bad For Net Branch Loan Officers?

I have noticed that there are several “side businesses” trying to recruit loan officers.

credit_repairforecloseBy “side businesses” I mean companies that offer services like credit repair or loan modification.

My in-box is full of offers and I see recruiting ads everywhere.

These companies are trying leverage the loan officers ability to connect with a group of clients that could also be prospects for their business. This is common business practice and you can find this in many industries.

It does raises a few real important questions.

1. What is the best use of your time.

Should loan officers invest their time building their own origination business or become a referral source to help someone else build their business?

Should you spend your time finding credit repair leads or another type of mortgage or real estate related service for someone else instead of investing your time in developing a referral network that delivers you an ongoing stream of business?

Credit repair and loan modification are not bad things (although everyone has heard the stories of companies that charged for services and did not deliver much in the way of results) and these services could help some people in the long run.

But I think that the question is really about time, focus, and reward.

How much time do you have to spend, is the activity diluting your focus, and how much of a reward will you receive.

Based on time and reward I think anyone would be better off focusing on their core services. You will profit more by focusing on the activities that help your core business instead of diluting your focus by spending time and effort on an activity that does not generate revenue for your core business.

Ask your self the question. Am I a loan officer or a loan modification representative? If you have to decide – which one are you?

What ever your answer is that is what you should focus on. Any one who tries to be all things to all people will fail at all of them.

2. Is this legal?
If you originate FHA loans – in today’s environment almost everyone does – you could be in violation of HUD employment rules.

HUD says it is OK for a mortgage company’s employees to have other employment but it cannot be with another mortgage company, a real estate company or any other finance related company. Here is the exact wording from the HUD handbook “They may have other employment including self employment. However, such outside employment may not be in mortgage lending, real estate, or a related field.” You can find this in Chapter 2, Item 2-9, G (Full Time, Part Time and Outside Employment).

I think credit repair and loan modification would fit HUD’s definition of “a related field”.

Credit repair has been around for a log time but for most of the time that the industry has existed FHA played a minor role and most mortgage companies did not consider HUD rules for many of their practices and policies. That has changed. FHA now is the primary product at most mortgage companies.

Loan modification is a relatively new part of our industry. I do not think many companies have gotten that far yet to ask the question of their compliance department – “Does this violate the HUD employment rule?”

The HUD rules on employment are simple. It is only a few sentences and leave little room for misinterpretation. As an employee of a HUD approved mortgage company you cannot work for another mortgage company, real estate company, or any company in a related field.

If you are employed as a  loan officer and you  are also acting as a credit repair, and/or  loan modification agent to earn additional income you should question your compliance department to make sure you have their OK.

Get it in writing.

Lee Walsh

Why join a national mortgage branch company for FHA?

Why join a national mortgage branch company for FHA?

flyingQInstead of joining a net branch company to originate FHA loan wouldn’t it be better to get your own company approved by HUD to originate FHA loans?

In most cases the answer is no.

Let’s look at some of the costs associated with any mortgage company getting a HUD approval.

Broker – If your company is a mortgage broker and you want to originate FHA loans you need to be approved as a non-supervised loan correspondent (I know the way different groups in our industry use the same term to mean completely different things is confusing and frustrating).

The minimum net worth is $63,000 plus $25,000 for each branch office (up to $250,000). At least 20% must be in liquid assets at all times.

This requirement is not a deal killer for many companies. But to prove your company’s net worth you must provide audited financials. This can run from $2,000 to $5,000 and take months to complete.

Then there is the HUD process. Once you have obtained the required financials it can take 6 months or longer for the application to be processed. I have talked to companies that have had their application in for over 8 months without any action.

If you want to be approved as a lender (non-supervised mortgagee in HUD speak) the net worth requirement jumps to $250,000 with a 20% liquid net worth. Renewal can bump the net worth requirement to $1,000,000 depending on the company’s production volume.

** update 11/01/2009 – there has been a major change in the HUD rules sinc ethis article was published. The broker approval process will be discontinued and the net worth requirements for a lender  is being increased to $1,000,000.

This will make it more difficult to become a HUD lender and the approval process to do 3rd party origination will become tougher.

For a small independent mortgage company these requirements can be a burden to maintain.

After you clear the net worth hurdle you have the HUD compliance requirements to meet. This is a lot more than reviewing closed files to make sure that the signatures, dates, and terms are correct.

Although some companies use a third party compliance review company for this process and they only do the minimum required by HUD for the process they are setting themselves up for some real financial pain down the road. HUD usually requires 10% – 20% review. That means that companies that only review the minimum  are leaving 80% to 90% of their files in the unknown category when they ask the question how compliant is our company.

When you become a branch of a national company they take care of these issues. The parent company is responsible for the net worth requirements and they are responsible for the compliance requirements.

For most  branch managers their income relies on their personal loan production. If they have to spend the majority of their time on the non-production activities that small independent owners must focus on they are losing revenue. When you are not originating you are not making money.

Nothing is free. A branch has to bear some of the cost for these services but instead of one or two offices bearing all of the costs they are spread out through out the entire branch network.  Each branch has far less cost for these services than they would if they were operating as a small independent company.

With a net branch mortgage company the branch managers can spend their time on the activities that generate income.

I hope you found this information helpful.

I always welcome comments and subscribers!

Three Lenders Latest To Be Suspended By HUD From FHA

HUD has announced the suspension of three lenders – these company’s FHA activity has been halted pending further investigation by HUD into their business practices.

lockedkeyboardThe three lenders are: Golden First Mortgage Corp of Great Neck, NY; Great Country Mortgage Bankers, Inc. of Coral Gables, FL; and Beneficial Mortgage Corporation of San Juan, PR.

Any Lender or Broker subject to suspension is prohibited from originating new FHA-insured mortgages pending completion of HUD’s investigation into their lending practices.

The reasons for each company’s suspension vary and include failure to implement a required quality control plan, failure to ensure that employees worked exclusively for the company, failing to notify HUD/FHA of an investigation by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) into the business activities of the company’s president and failing to notify HUD/FHA of an investigation and sanctions imposed by the another regulatory agency related to mortgage servicing practices.

The message from HUD is clear – if you are involved with HUD lending you need to be compliant with all rules and regulations.

In the past many companies – especially net branch groups played fast and loose with state and federal regulations. Many mortgage companies ignored HUD rules and regulations thinking that they are not paying attention.

That (if it was true) has changed.

If your company’s compliance department is not paying attention they could one of the next companies to be featured in a HUD press release.

For more information about these companies and HUD see the full press release:
http://www.hud.gov/news/release.cfm?content=pr09-086.cfm

Net Branch Mortgage Broker vs. Mortgage Lender – Which is Better?


If you are considering joining a net branch company one of the biggest decisions you face is the lender vs. broker decision.

In the past the ability to be both a broker and a lender was a valid option. Today although most companies still promote the available option to be broker or lender – in today’s reality that is not an option that is really available to you.

Why?

Because of a little rule that HUD has in place for FHA loans.

The HUD rule says your company has to either broker 100% or lend 100% on FHA loans. You company cannot “cherry pick” by allowing you to close some FHA loans as a lender and allow you to broker the loans they do not like.

Since the majority of loans closing are now FHA – the HUD rule is pretty much the rule of the day.

So with this in mind – which is better for a net branch opportunity -  Broker or lender?

Here are the pluses and minuses.

Lender: Pluses

  • Close in your company name
  • No disclosure of YSP
  • Status of telling client you area lender
  • Ability to work with in-house underwriters

Lender: Minuses

  • Greater risk to company
  • Must usually go through company underwriter not end investors
  • Experienced FHA underwriters are very hard to find and keep
  • Company warehouse limits can restrict or stop funding at end of month
  • Limited investor options

Broker: Pluses

  • Can use many different investors
  • Work directly with investor
  • direct wholesale pricing

Broker: Minuses

  • Must disclose YSP
  • Some states restrict mortgage broker fees
  • Junk fees from investors can be a little  higher
  • Wholesale investors are exiting the business

As you can see there is not a clear cut winner in this comparison.

You have to do your homework. You have to ask a lot of questions before you make a decision.

As a mortgage net branch manager your decision should be a careful one.

If you are talking to a company that does not want to take the time to discuss this important issue it should be an indicator that you have not found the right company to work with.

I try to present information about net branch opportunities in an impartial way. The main objective of this section of the site is to give facts about the net branch industry in general.

If you would like to know about the opportunity I can provide please contact me by clicking here.

Net Branch -  Mortgage Broker  -Mortgage Lender – FHA Net Branch

2 More National Retail Mortgage Companies Close Doors

Ameritime Mortgage and Residential Loan Centers of America

It appears that Ameritime Mortgage, based in Houston, TX and Residential Loan Centers of America, Des Plaines, IL have ceased lending. Their websites are down.

Ameritime Mortgage funded loans in over 40 states and offered branch opportunities in around 20 states. RLCA operated in 18 states.

Although it appears that the companies shut down for different reasons it still boils down to either their revenue model was flawed or their compliance practices were lacking in the majority of recent closings.